3 ms·
> How hard is it to write an email client? > With some calendar? > Is it complete rocket surgery or something in the realms of feasibly possible? Oh dearie.
by mseebach 13y ago
> How hard is it to write an email client?
> With some calendar?
> Is it complete rocket surgery or something in the realms of feasibly possible?
Oh dearie. Thus began every single failed multi-million-dollar software project in the history of software.
> Wasn't gmail some 20%-er time by a couple of guys at Google? I don't think it took years or billions to get up and running.
A: The feature-set of GMail as is released in 2004 is unlikely to impress someone used to Outlook/Exchange
B: What a correctly motivated Google-quality engineer can cook up in a few years (which is apparently how long GMail was in development before release) has little to no correlation to what a government can procure from a systems integrator. Also, I don't recall the calendar being worth much back them. Maybe, maybe, maybe if they hired Google-grade engineers, paid them Google salaries and gave them Google-freedom to work on this, they might be able to pull it off. But that's a lot harder than it sounds.
EDIT:
> do something on its own about securing government communications
It's not hard to secure an email installation - its interface to the internet at large is super small and well understood (SMTP). Most likely NSA grabs the mail they want from outside the installation by sniffing unencrypted network traffic.
A worthwhile effort, and one quite suitable for a government even, is to get people to encrypt their emails.
- guiambros 13y agoOh c'mon. The Gmail of 2013 is not that different from the Gmail of 2004 (unless you count Priority Inbox as an advancement). There's really nothing complex or fancy in developing a bare bones secure email system. And keep in mind these poor souls are using Lotus Notes (!), so it can't get much worse than that. Also, it's not that it has to be built entirely from scratch. They will likely re-use existing ideas from other systems, and even (licenses permitting) other open source solutions as a starting point. All in all, I wish we had more governments stepping up against this whole US spying mess. The real long term solution is not to have each government developing their own proprietary email systems, but for the US to be more transparent and stop the illegal spying. Sadly, this will have to get worse before it gets better. We'll probably watch a few years of increasing distrust and strained relationships, before governments start to come to terms with the US again.