3 ms·
That's the only one in mine too. The problem with Newsstand isn't the folder. It's that there are no good publications for it. Publishers just export their PDF
by k-mcgrady 13y ago
That's the only one in mine too. The problem with Newsstand isn't the folder. It's that there are no good publications for it. Publishers just export their PDF into the app. If they designed an experience like the NYT or The Magazine I'd be using Newsstand a lot more. I wouldn't mind Apple forcing them to do it either (i.e. new 'guideline' preventing apps which only sell PDF's).
- Tloewald 13y agoActually, just exporting a PDF would be a huge improvement on most of the periodicals I've tried. Instead they do stuff like exporting enormous bitmaps of text pages, making for bigger downloads, uglier text, and inability to search.
- eli 13y agoIf you think Newsstand is bad, you should definitely avoid the Kindle version.
- AsymetricCom 13y agoA quick skimming of the reviews of NYTimes 4 Kindle show mostly positive associations with the Kindle-specific features.
- eli 13y agoThere are kindle specific features? I think most people like the fact that even the Sunday edition is only $1 (that's why I buy it). It's very bare bones. Pretty much just text and sometimes a single image. Charts or images with text are usually unreadable.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- mimiflynn 13y ago> It's that there are no good publications for it. Publishers just export their PDF into the app. I don't find this to be the case. National Geographic includes video, and Wired includes interesting intactive content. The New Yorker even includes a section where you can read all the cartoons ;) Hardly just a PDF export.
- lena 13y agoI read Scientific American Mind and I actually wish it were a PDF. Instead, it's an app, with content that I can hide and show and some additional features like the odd video. It's pretty, but it's a shame that it is completely tied to my iPad and the articles aren't shareable with anyone, or saveable.