logical grounds for dismissing all evidence I don't know why Evolutionist trolls continue to insist that ID advocates "toss out all the evidence". You are awa

logical grounds for dismissing all evidence I don't know why Evolutionist trolls continue to insist that ID advocates "toss out all the evidence". You are aware that the same "evidence" such as the vast fossil record, and insane complexity of the universe is what forms the basis for the ID argument, right? Even Dawkins himself admits that all intuition indicates that the universe has been designed. I'm not tossing out any evidence, I'm re-interpreting it under my own world-view, in the same fashion that you have your own self validating world-view where you interpret the "evidence". Regardless, explain to me how forensic science and circumstantial evidence works if my "shit" above regarding the bomb example is not sound. It's not a truth table that I've written above, it's an assertion that we can guess with high probability what event happened if 1) we have seen the event in the past or can replicate it and 2) we understand the effects and resulting evidence for that event.