> On past form, the winner will be an aging Anglophone, Caucasian male. He will also probably be a dangerous crank. So... much like the author of this rant? I

> On past form, the winner will be an aging Anglophone, Caucasian male. He will also probably be a dangerous crank. So... much like the author of this rant? It's a cute quip in the title but there's nothing more to that article. Mood affiliation in its pure form. And Krugman is the notable exception? The guy who cheered the real estate bubble on?