4 ms·
Because it wasn't one. Encouraging abuse of these loopholes is the best way to get them reexamined. If you think email providers should be entitled to the same
by n09n 13y ago
Because it wasn't one. Encouraging abuse of these loopholes is the best way to get them reexamined.
If you think email providers should be entitled to the same level of protection, okay. That's a sensible change to suggest. I don't see what good you think can come of obviously apolitical email providers pretending they are political organizations to get additional benefits. That's a "let's pretend we're a church so we don't have to pay any taxes!" level idea.
- antocv 13y agoAny political organization in the world should be very worried about its communications since the Snowden revelations. I wonder why we havent heard major political parties in EU countries them setting up their email/communications-equipment/networks/services inside their parliament buildings, or even just re-checking their current security standards.
- tedunangst 13y agoBecause 1) they've known all along this has been happening and 2) they don't really care, public histrionics to the contrary.