3 ms·
I had no idea who he was until Colbert decided to make him part of his schtick last week. http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/429573/october
by Moto7451 13y ago
I had no idea who he was until Colbert decided to make him part of his schtick last week.
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/429573/october-07-2013/banksy-s-new-york-reign-of-terror http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/42957...
Like most things, just getting people to talk about him will raise his profile. Being mentioned on national TV and the network news doesn't hurt either.
That said, I must confess my ignorance as I'm unaware of why Banksy is relevant. I don't mean high level ignorance, as I have googled around and I get the general idea of his works and some of the social issues his works relate to. What I mean is I'm unaware of how he became relevant in pop culture. Does anyone here know?
Banksy's wikipedia article[1] doesn't particularly spell it out. Did his first works show up in a particularly public area in response to a poignant event and the British media noticed it? Did his work catch on organically?
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy#Early_career_.281992.E2.80.932001.29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy#Early_career_.281992.E2....
- TylerE 13y agoThe closest touchstone might be to think about Andy Warhol.
- anigbrowl 13y agoI suggest you just get one of his books and look at the art for a while. He's been doing his thing for a long time and has built up a following. I've been a fan for years.
- 001sky 13y agoBanksy is relevant because most gallery art is crap. Take that as your starting point. If you don't understand that, without having to research it, you won't get Banksy. Banksy is not relevant to 'pop' culture, he was famous as an underground artist. Pop culture consumes anything (like the internet) that has social currency, regardless of whether or not it is relevant to pop culture per se.