3 ms·
I thought that OWL (at least the Pascal version) was pretty reasonable for what it did. I can understand the frustration with Java, though. The first time I s
by Roboprog 13y ago
I thought that OWL (at least the Pascal version) was pretty reasonable for what it did.
I can understand the frustration with Java, though. The first time I started reading through "web.xml", I thought it was a bit much. Then I read the EJB specs...
Struts, at least the older versions I've had to maintain, is a nightmare. RoR seemed to have a lot less BS to do the same thing.
- pjmlp 13y agoYeah, OWL was miles ahead of MFC.