40 ms·

Excellent example of Occam's razor.

• eruditely 13y ago
  It definitely wasn't an application of Occam's razor. Sigh, what is everyone's obsessions with retrofitting a small amount of logical tools everywhere?
  • NoPiece 13y ago
    Confirmation bias?
    • kaoD 13y ago
      I see what you did there.
  • trentmb 13y ago
    > Sigh, what is everyone's obsessions with retrofitting a small amount of logical tools everywhere? It makes them feel smart. I'm going to put my head through a wall next time I see someone type 'fallacy.'
    • Sagat 13y ago
      Wow, what's up with the ad hominem, bro?
      • steveklabnik 13y ago
        Not ad hominem, they didn't say they were wrong because they feel smart. Sigh.
        • deleted 13y ago
          [deleted]
  • auctiontheory 13y ago
    My understanding of Occam's razor is "use the simplest explanation that fits the facts." The implied question is "Why do Harvard students take this class?" Rather than resort to philosophical mumbo-jumbo (as the article does) about Harvard students feeling a yearning to improve their overprivileged existence, the simplest explanation is that students take the class because it offers an easy A. QED
    • steveklabnik 13y ago
      Isn't "this course will change your life" just as simple? They don't learn the 'mumbo-jumbo' until they attend the class.
  • eli_gottlieb 13y ago
    >Sigh, what is everyone's obsessions with retrofitting a small amount of logical tools everywhere? Most people don't like thinking. Even the people who do like thinking only have a finite capacity for it, and don't like spending their/our thought-power on things they/we don't really care about.