3 ms·

so, you could even skip the math and just append the string representations of the primes. It seems the really difficult part is finding a good simple fraction

so, you could even skip the math and just append the string representations of the primes. It seems the really difficult part is finding a good simple fraction to express the string. Perhaps that's the key here. maybe the primes summed in the sequences are a subset that produces a relatively simple fractional representation.

Someone 13y ago
No. If you know some theorems about continued fractions, finding such rational numbers is easy. Just generate best rational approximations until you have one that is close enough. See for example http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/cfINTRO.html#real http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci... or http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~tony/whatsnew/column/irrational-0799/irrational3.html http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~tony/whatsnew/column/irrational-...