4 ms·
"Testimony from a witness is always subjective..." I guess what i am trying to say is that they are drawing conclusions of what they saw, not just stating the
by jimzvz 13y ago
"Testimony from a witness is always subjective..."
I guess what i am trying to say is that they are drawing conclusions of what they saw, not just stating the facts of what they saw.
"...this isn't a criminal trial"
This is my point, we have no right to judge his guilt or innocence without a proper investigation and a trial based on this investigation.
"That 1am / midnight shit... really?"
I think it just shows that witnesses aren't necessarily a reliable form of evidence.
My point is that presumed innocence until proven otherwise is important. These kind of blog posts can help create awareness and allow us to discuss such situations but with regards to the actual event, we should refrain from judgment, as difficult as that is, because anything could have happened or not happened. Trial by social media is not okay.
- justin66 13y ago> we have no right to judge his guilt or innocence We have no real standing to judge, no need to judge, but I have the right to do whatever I want, thank you. :) > because anything could have happened or not happened This is a little silly if read literally. I think you can tease out a couple of things that very certainly happened by reading the three available accounts. > Trial by social media is not okay. So much could be said about that topic. It's fairly horrifying in some instances. On the other hand, if this was cathartic or necessary for this woman, good for her.