The two of you are doing two things at the same time. First, you're having an intellectually legitimate debate that's probably revealing some good counter poin

The two of you are doing two things at the same time. First, you're having an intellectually legitimate debate that's probably revealing some good counter points and offering valid, alternative perspectives on the broader issue. Second, you're continuing a cold argument devoid of any (productive) empathy in lieu of passionate, scientific rigor. This is not what this post needs. Let it go, guys. Neither of you is going to convince anyone meaningfully. The issue is polarizing enough as it is. This is a situation that calls for empathy and support, and the interchange of ideas that won't put other people off of listening to each other in an open way. I don't mean to be self-righteous, but this is a community somewhat known for entering into page-length tangential debates -- that would be detrimental to the subject at hand.