4 ms·
The comments are... odd. I can understand leaving comments open as an illustration of the backlash that results from trying to talk about these matters, but at
by cegev 13y ago
The comments are... odd. I can understand leaving comments open as an illustration of the backlash that results from trying to talk about these matters, but at some point, banning particular people makes sense: the majority of the comments there are vile primarily because the majority of comments have been made by one apparently obsessed person making utterly ridiculous comments in a deranged tone.
I fear that the shock of those comments hides what I consider the more important, problematic vilification going on in the comments, which is the argument made by a few sane people that talking about this, rather than keeping it a private matter, is not appropriate, and that Justine should have stayed silent and only gone to the police. This is perhaps more harmful, as it comes from people who aren't obviously deranged or trolling.
- steveklabnik 13y agoConsider that the person who would be doing the banning is the victim, which means that she would have to read all of those shitty comments, continually, in order to determine who to ban.
- stock_toaster 13y agoI cringed when I saw that comments were enabled _at all_ on that post.
- steveklabnik 13y agoJustine explicitly said that she's leaving them on in order to show everyone what happens when someone reports a sexual assault.
- stock_toaster 13y agoAh. I didn't see that mentioned in the post itself anywhere. Thanks for the info.
- steveklabnik 13y agoNo problem, it was on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SaltineJustine/status/388908504209047552 https://twitter.com/SaltineJustine/status/388908504209047552
- pm 13y ago"Erin" sounds like "she" has an axe to grind with Justine.
- gingerlime 13y agoErin == Joe O'Brien ? (rien/erin...?)
- steveklabnik 13y agoSpeculation like this isn't particularly productive. It's just as likely that someone else thought of the same association as you and chose the name to impersonate.
- gingerlime 13y ago> It's just as likely that someone else thought of the same association as you and chose the name to impersonate. And by doing this they achieve what? Tarnishing Joe's already-tarnished reputation? They could have also pretended to be Joe O'Brien directly. Is there a gain from trying to hint at a potential association? Even if the name similarities are pure coincidence, it's not entirely unlikely that this commenter is in fact Joe O'Brien or someone close to him. Of course it's pure speculation, and perhaps you're right and it's not productive to make such speculation. I didn't have any ill intent.