4 ms·
Then there'd be two ways to view the word "tagging." One is the UI and organization style you popularized through del.icio.us. The other is the common English
by DocSavage 17y ago
Then there'd be two ways to view the word "tagging." One is the UI and organization style you popularized through del.icio.us. The other is the common English gerund of "to tag", which is the way Common Tag is using it. Maybe it would have been better for them to call it Common Label...
Re: common "tags" through a shared namespace -- seems like it'd be a good thing to do and would increase the relevancy of our stuff to search engines. Would Google actively support Common Tag or does Google support it naturally through RDF indexing?
This approach also reminds me to review the debates on Ontology.
http://www.peterme.com/archives/000558.html http://www.peterme.com/archives/000558.html
I would like to implement some kind of semantic marking for the data on my web site. If not Common Tag, what's the best way to say "this is an Author who has written that" or "this is regarding the Terminator movie (1984) directed by Cameron..."?
- joshu 17y agoRDF or RDFa plus any of the myriad schemas that are available. You would use Dublin Core for the first, and you could reference the IMDB URI space for the second. Commontag does not appear to do these things.
- DocSavage 17y agoCommon Tag uses RDFa so I'm confused (bear with me) on your objection to the scheme. The use of Freebase and DBPedia makes sense since all of their data is under relatively open license, unlike IMDB.