2 ms·
Agreed. Completely misses on-die caches for instance. Article might have been accurate in the 6502 days, but not today.
by alain94040 13y ago
Agreed. Completely misses on-die caches for instance. Article might have been accurate in the 6502 days, but not today.
- masklinn 13y ago> Agreed. Completely misses on-die caches for instance. Absolutely, except for the part where he mentions them > If you're really lucky and the value is in L1 cache, it'll only take a few cycles.