3 ms·
Read this very internal memo and decide for yourself. Surely, you could argue for China and Russia breaking human rights, but they don't portray themselves as t
by insuffi 13y ago
Read this very internal memo and decide for yourself. Surely, you could argue for China and Russia breaking human rights, but they don't portray themselves as the moral authority in the world.
The document says this: kill squads, assassination, execution, immunity for the soldiers doing the assassinations. What the documents don't say - destabilize the region, overthrowing foreign governments for political benefit(you could argue they're just playing the geopolitics game with Russia), political exiles, breaching their own constitution in whatever way they can, hacking and cracking(surely an individual hacker would've gotten 50 or so life sentences for the things they've done).
You tell me this is a big stretch.
- mpyne 13y ago> Read this very internal memo and decide for yourself. Surely, you could argue for China and Russia breaking human rights, but they don't portray themselves as the moral authority in the world. Russia does, do they not? Were you not paying attention for Snowden or Syria? If Russia is not a moral authority that is at least compatible with WikiLeaks's moral goals then why would Assange host a television show on the state-sponsored Russia Today channel?
- SkyMarshal 13y ago>then why would Assange host a television show on the state-sponsored Russia Today channel? Plenty of possible reasons for that. One would be b/c there's no way Assange could get a TV show in the US, but RT has a decent Youtube following here.