4 ms·
You could have an automated site extracting whitehouse photos from here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse and all
by adrianwaj 17y ago
You could have an automated site extracting whitehouse photos from here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse and allow users to customize.
edit: "The photograph may not be manipulated in any way or used in materials, advertisements, products, or promotions that in any way suggest approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House."
maybe not.
- randallsquared 17y agoThat's what hosting in The Netherlands is for.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- SkyMarshal 17y agoBad idea. Since Obama's not only a Muslim but the second coming of the prophet Abraham, peace be upon him, he'll murder anyone who blasphemes his picture.
- htsh 17y agoI think its fine as long is at doesn't in any way suggest approval or endorsement of the President.. Public figures are pretty much fair game. The question is whether the "manipulated in any way" is modified by "that in any way suggest approval." The way this clause is constructed, I would read it as such.
- fredBuddemeyer 17y agoactually played this card even further once with billboards of bush http://www.bigredwire.com/images/photos/bush_sign.gif http://www.bigredwire.com/images/photos/bush_sign.gif and a quote we put in his mouth. some newspapers balked but nary a word from w. everyone else loved it.
- lacker 17y agoI'm pretty sure any picture that looks like a "nut punch" will not suggest endorsement of the President.