3 ms·

"internal" I don't believe for a second this document wasn't intended for public release from the outset.

• chm 13y ago
  Why couldn't the person(s) in charge of reviewing the script(s) have prepared a presentation/document in order to inform the rest of the crew about it and _then_ collectively decided to publish certain information?
• seabee 13y ago
  Their raison d'être is transparency, but publicising an internal memo doesn't magically turn it into a press release. It is clearly structured and written for WikiLeaks affiliated staff to use when discussing the film, anything else is a bonus.
  • mpyne 13y ago
    Correction: Their raison d'être used to be transparency. They are certainly willing now to hold onto documents that do not advance their own political agenda. Likewise the memo is sitting on a public folder on wikileaks.org, I'm pretty sure Assange or his troops could hack together a private intranet if that was what was actually desired here. This is a PR release that is just as transparent as when the U.S. "leaks" positive news to the NYT.