3 ms·
TBH, I didn't have many problems with AMD's recent Catalyst drivers. The graphics performance is good and they have the fastest and most feature complete OpenC
by ginko 13y ago
TBH, I didn't have many problems with AMD's recent Catalyst drivers.
The graphics performance is good and they have the fastest and most feature complete OpenCL implementation by far. Early buffer swap latency problems have been ironed out.
The only real gripes I have is that vsync with multiple monitors doesn't work too well and KMS isn't supported.
And at least with AMD I can be sure that my card will keep being supported by open source drivers once Catalyst support is dropped.
- puller 13y agoI don't agree. The graphics performance is far worse than the Windows drivers. I see that a game which runs at full normal speed in Windows tends to run at an unplayable crawl in Linux. The open source drivers are a terrible power drain on laptops. Perhaps some of this varies depending on the part? But none of this inspires confidence.