3 ms·
I could comprehend the first piece of code in about 20 seconds and the final result in a couple minutes. It's pulled apart nicely, but it's not as simple any mo
by tomlu 13y ago
I could comprehend the first piece of code in about 20 seconds and the final result in a couple minutes. It's pulled apart nicely, but it's not as simple any more.
The end result might look better in something like Lisp or Ruby, but I don't think it's a great tradeoff in Python.
- Suor 13y agoThere is a price for new vocabulary involved, which is some learning curve. By the way, first piece of code can become much more hairy with time.
- hcarvalhoalves 13y agoIt depends on what you consider simple. I don't consider the earlier code simple, just crude. Testing it, or adding features (e.g., tacking caching) would increasingly make it messier, plus the code mixes error handling and low-level concerns with business logic. The final result is broke up in nicely referentially transparent functions, making testing or refactoring more trivial. Also, the main body reads as a DSL, a programmer can pick this code and more easily figure out what it does, which is easier to reason about.