3 ms·
I'm afraid you're comparing two entirely different genres. People who read popular non-fiction (on science, economics etc.) aren't looking to learn concepts the
by r0h1n 13y ago
I'm afraid you're comparing two entirely different genres. People who read popular non-fiction (on science, economics etc.) aren't looking to learn concepts the way you are. They, I surmise, want to read interesting stories that can be explained using science/economics etc.
In other words, you're attempting to learn the science so you can apply it, while most others are attempting to read stories which can be explained using science.
- kiba 13y agoIn other words, you're attempting to learn the science so you can apply it, while most others are attempting to read stories which can be explained using science. I don't need to apply the scientific knowledge. I have gratification in knowing how reality work.
- vdaniuk 13y agoConsider yourself lucky. It is currently impossible to flip a switch in the brain and get gratification from knowing. For those who do not enjoy understanding the inner workings the textbook aproach will never work.
- pjmorris 13y agoYes, and more power to you, but your boss, and his boss, and your city manager, and the people providing the services you have are basing their decisions on something. If it's pseudo-science instead of the real thing, you're still living with the consequences.