4 ms·
I have done less than 10 hours of .NET programming in my life so I have no idea here... but my impression is that MONO substantially less accepted than a standa
by KevinEldon 13y ago
I have done less than 10 hours of .NET programming in my life so I have no idea here... but my impression is that MONO substantially less accepted than a standard Java port... not trying to bash, just explaining my view. I'm moving a significant production Java app from a Linux box to Windows in the next 3 months. My expected work is about 2-days, and frankly my management wouldn't expect more, and I'd have a hard time justifying more (it's probably padded already... don't tell). The portability of Java apps is wonderful. I'd guess MONO could do the same thing, Windows to Linux, but just explaining the run-time to my management or Change Management would require testing, which is cost, which is probably waste, but is also necessary... a Oracle JVM on Linux or Windows, doesn't require the same due diligence.
- stormbrew 13y agoUnity is probably the biggest commercial use of Mono: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(game_engine) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(game_engine)
- CmonDev 13y agoXamarin is more likely.
- 300bps 13y agoI have done less than 10 hours of .NET programming in my life so I have no idea here... but Then don't comment. Your comment is comparing something you know to something you have no idea about. How can anyone legitimately make such a comparison?
- peeters 13y agoI can tell you I've done 10 minutes of C# programming in my life, while addressing a StackOverflow comment, and in that 10 minutes I found something that worked on Microsoft's .NET runtime but not on Mono. You don't need experience to find evidence.