Just wanted to take the time to ask: If you want anglophones to read up on operational security, and perhaps adhere to such tenets as prescribed in your article

Just wanted to take the time to ask: If you want anglophones to read up on operational security, and perhaps adhere to such tenets as prescribed in your articles, why are all of your sites plaintext and not secure? Another tidbit is that they mostly seem to be listed under a subdomain of your namesake, meaning that a person perusing your blogs would still reveal that they were reading your work, even over a secure connection, since the subdomain is communicated in plaintext to resolve the dns lookup. When writing about paranoia at the nation state scale, these details become important, because you're ostensibly educating english-speaking users on the black art of skull duggery. A subdomain is a good way to ups fame, but it would be slightly better to engage in forbidden discussions of this sort, with a free blog platform that offers HTTPS service, and urls identified by solely the /uri?query=string, with respect to the domain, since the non-domain portion of the URL is wrapped in SSL's encryption. ;) ...otherwise, maybe some nation state now has a list of readers borrowing subversive literature from the public library, no? And so many of them showing ycombinator as their referrer! What a seedy little hotbed of intelligencia!