4 ms·
It seems like you're really creating two products, an editor and a collaboration platform. Imagine if Github forced you to do all coding with a custom IDE. That
by dec0dedab0de 13y ago
It seems like you're really creating two products, an editor and a collaboration platform. Imagine if Github forced you to do all coding with a custom IDE. That said, the simple UX sounds great, and I wouldn't even have brought it up if there was a Linux client.
- hisham_hm 13y ago> Imagine if Github forced you to do all coding with a custom IDE. That's a great analogy. Github is a great model: I'd rather do as much as I could in-browser and then only the stuff that requires local access to be done from my tools of choice.
- PabloOsinaga 13y agoThis debate is really interesting and one that I think about a lot. I think a github for your DAW is a great tool for an audio engineer, or a self-produced / technology-geek musician. I think a "21st century portastudio" is the best tool for the average musician (hobbyist or pro). What that 21st century portastudio looks like is up to be seen. But we think certainly not like a githubed-DAW Thoughts?