3 ms·
That is interesting and opens the whole debate of whether it's best to let people integrate their tools vs having our own experience. We'd love to find a way t
by PabloOsinaga 13y ago
That is interesting and opens the whole debate of whether it's best to let people integrate their tools vs having our own experience.
We'd love to find a way to let people use their tools - however, the type of UX that we are going after is 10x simpler than any DAW or recording software out there.
- dec0dedab0de 13y agoIt seems like you're really creating two products, an editor and a collaboration platform. Imagine if Github forced you to do all coding with a custom IDE. That said, the simple UX sounds great, and I wouldn't even have brought it up if there was a Linux client.
- hisham_hm 13y ago> Imagine if Github forced you to do all coding with a custom IDE. That's a great analogy. Github is a great model: I'd rather do as much as I could in-browser and then only the stuff that requires local access to be done from my tools of choice.
- PabloOsinaga 13y agoThis debate is really interesting and one that I think about a lot. I think a github for your DAW is a great tool for an audio engineer, or a self-produced / technology-geek musician. I think a "21st century portastudio" is the best tool for the average musician (hobbyist or pro). What that 21st century portastudio looks like is up to be seen. But we think certainly not like a githubed-DAW Thoughts?