3 ms·
Really? That's embarrassingly slow. Does it do better for QR-codes? It'd be wiser to purchase a $100 barcode scanner for scanning a large collection of books.
by paulgb 17y ago
Really? That's embarrassingly slow. Does it do better for QR-codes?
It'd be wiser to purchase a $100 barcode scanner for scanning a large collection of books.
You could also try a CueCat, if you can find one on eBay.
- DTrejo 17y agoUnder good conditions (plenty of light, not much shaking), it may be faster that 4-5 seconds.