3 ms·
Indeed. If we chose to treat drug addiction as a disease instead of a crime, we could vastly reduce the current prison population levels. We would see an over
by ansible 13y ago
Indeed. If we chose to treat drug addiction as a disease instead of a crime, we could vastly reduce the current prison population levels. We would see an overall reduction in violence too. Gangs and organized crime would still exist, but without one of their major funding sources, they would have a dramatically lower impact on our society as a whole.
Of course, the law enforcement complex and the prison industrial complex may not like to see their main reason for existence (and funding) reduced, so they are likely to fight changes to the War on Drugs. And if people are smoking more weed, maybe they're drinking less alcohol, so there are other interested parties who, by the way, have lots of money for marketing and lobbying.
The sad fact is that the USA isn't really seeing the worst of it. I read stories about the cartels in Mexico and just cringe. We are destabilizing our neighbouring nation, our important trading partner and ally over this issue.
- Touche 13y ago> Indeed. If we chose to treat drug addiction as a disease instead of a crime Treat it like a disease, you mean.
- ansible 13y agoActually, I'm fine with both senses of what I originally wrote. We need to treat the individuals the same as if they had a problem with alcohol. We should also plot out drug use on a map, much like the CDC looks at an outbreak of cholera. Look at the factors that may be contributing to increased cases (poverty mainly, but there may be other things), and then start working on those.