4 ms·

What an incredibly self-righteous and unnecessary response. Everyone hates recruiters, fine, I get that. It doesn't change the fact that like you, they are als

by Peroni 13y ago

What an incredibly self-righteous and unnecessary response. Everyone hates recruiters, fine, I get that. It doesn't change the fact that like you, they are also trying to make a living. They also have friends and family that give a shit about them and despite the fact that they may be exceptionally annoying at times, responses like this are simply rude and unprofessional. 6 or 7 no replies is "I'm not interested" in normal person speak. Wrong. 1 reply of "I'm not interested, please don't contact me again." is normal speak. Sorry Matt but your response does you no favours and it certainly doesn't educate the recruiter in question.

mattbillenstein 13y ago
And you thought nothing that they've completely taken the human part out of it and the fact that that email was sent by a machine? It's spam - a conversation isn't one way and if she wanted to have one I'd appreciate the email actually being sent by a human, not a form letter from a machine - so you can see why I don't reply in the first place and how six or seven emails gets annoying...
- Peroni 13y ago
  ...they've completely taken the human part out of it and the fact that that email was sent by a machine? As I said, that may be annoying but it's not rude or patronising. I'm not attempting to justify her approach or persistence. Had you previously asked her to stop and she subsequently ignored that request then your response would have been entirely justified. Professionalism goes both ways regardless of how little value you place in the other persons use to you.
  - mattbillenstein 13y ago
    I appreciate what you're saying, but I'm just numb to recruiters now - I've received enough bad-form contacts (cold-calls from people looking up my phone number in DNS records even) that I've lost all sympathy. I guess that is my failing here.
    - morgante 13y ago
      > cold-calls from people looking up my phone number in DNS records even I actually kind of respect that. At least they took the effort to look up your domain and do a whois. In general, I reward recruiters who bother to visit my site (and use the contact info there) by actually reading what they send.
eshvk 13y ago
Dude, I get where you are coming from but seriously, the word No doesn't get processed by a salesperson the way normal people process it. My Linkedin profile explicitly says "No third party recruiters". I have explicitly responded to multiple third party recruiters telling them I do not want my resume in their hand, I don't want to be considered for any position from whatever shitty stealth startup they are working with. Nope. Nothing. I still get emails; GUESS WHAT? THEY ARE FROM THE SAME FUCKING RECRUITER(S).
- Peroni 13y ago
  I agree with your second paragraph entirely. There's nothing to indicate that OP had a similar disclosure on his LinkedIn and he implicitly states that at no point did he tell her to stop prior to this email. If he had and she ignored that request then his response would have been entirely justified. Most agency recruiters are terrible. Most couldn't care less what you think of them. Most of them are entirely deluded and believe they are the greatest sales people to walk the earth. Most. Not all. Recruiter bashing is easy however remaining professional is more appropriate.
- markyc 13y ago
  "the word No doesn't get processed by a salesperson the way normal people process it" how true. don't all self professed sales gurus teach that you need to get through 7 "No"-s to get a "Yes"
- christoph 13y ago
  THIS. We put a job advert up on LinkedIn recently. It said in big bold capital letters at the very top "Absolutely no agencies/recruiters" Guess what? We got 50+ calls from job agencies in under 1 week. Some, multiple times, even after we politely told them we were not interested and not to contact us again. My only guess is that people working in recruitment have targets to hit in terms of number of calls to make each day and they'll try and hit that target anyway possible.
  - Peroni 13y ago
    My only guess is that people working in recruitment have targets to hit in terms of number of calls to make each day and they'll try and hit that target anyway possible A guess that happens to be 100% accurate. Recruiters are targeted on a huge number of factors, primarily the number of jobs they fill obviously but also the number of new clients acquired, number of clients contacted, candidate contacts, client visits, etc. It's a long list.
philwelch 13y ago
"I'm just trying to make a living for my family" is the last refuge of telemarketers, car dealers, and the assholes who ship me junk mail every week that goes straight from the mailbox to the recycle bin.
bradgessler 13y ago
Peroni, I notice you're a recruiter. Shouldn't you be distancing yourself from clearly bad recruiting practices?
- Peroni 13y ago
  I'm an internal recruiter not an agency recruiter. A distinction I'm very defensive about! I've built my reputation on attacking poor recruiting practices and I agree that this particular recruiter's approach is poor, however I believe the response is significantly worse.
cowls 13y ago
Yes, it seems being contacted by a lot of recruiters has really gone to this guys head. This is incredibly unprofessional, a simple polite, "Im not currently looking" would be suffice. The recruiter doesnt need his life story.
- mattbillenstein 13y ago
  Does spam go to your head? I usually reply "I'm not looking right now - thx" to principles - ie, Google or Facebook or some internal recruiter trying to hire people. I get it, I've used recruiters in the past, and when done right, they're a valuable tool. This is spam, if you spam me, expect the pointy end of something. And it's not like I cursed her up and down and sideways or anything - just giving her a piece of my mind.
Isofarro 13y ago
"Wrong. 1 reply of "I'm not interested, please don't contact me again." is normal speak." No. This is no different to spam, it is an unsolicited email for commercial gain for the sender. What you are advocating is that a recipient opts out of an unsolicited contact. That doesn't scale. It places the onus on clearing up the mess on the recipient. The presence of an email address on the web doesn't confer the right to reply for the sender. It cannot be considered opting into anything. And as such, it should not require a recipient to opt-out. Don't assume silence means consent.

by Peroni 13y ago

mattbillenstein 13y ago

And you thought nothing that they've completely taken the human part out of it and the fact that that email was sent by a machine? It's spam - a conversation isn't one way and if she wanted to have one I'd appreciate the email actually being sent by a human, not a form letter from a machine - so you can see why I don't reply in the first place and how six or seven emails gets annoying...

Peroni 13y ago
...they've completely taken the human part out of it and the fact that that email was sent by a machine? As I said, that may be annoying but it's not rude or patronising. I'm not attempting to justify her approach or persistence. Had you previously asked her to stop and she subsequently ignored that request then your response would have been entirely justified. Professionalism goes both ways regardless of how little value you place in the other persons use to you.
- mattbillenstein 13y ago
  I appreciate what you're saying, but I'm just numb to recruiters now - I've received enough bad-form contacts (cold-calls from people looking up my phone number in DNS records even) that I've lost all sympathy. I guess that is my failing here.
  - morgante 13y ago
    > cold-calls from people looking up my phone number in DNS records even I actually kind of respect that. At least they took the effort to look up your domain and do a whois. In general, I reward recruiters who bother to visit my site (and use the contact info there) by actually reading what they send.

eshvk 13y ago

Dude, I get where you are coming from but seriously, the word No doesn't get processed by a salesperson the way normal people process it. My Linkedin profile explicitly says "No third party recruiters". I have explicitly responded to multiple third party recruiters telling them I do not want my resume in their hand, I don't want to be considered for any position from whatever shitty stealth startup they are working with. Nope. Nothing. I still get emails; GUESS WHAT? THEY ARE FROM THE SAME FUCKING RECRUITER(S).

Peroni 13y ago
I agree with your second paragraph entirely. There's nothing to indicate that OP had a similar disclosure on his LinkedIn and he implicitly states that at no point did he tell her to stop prior to this email. If he had and she ignored that request then his response would have been entirely justified. Most agency recruiters are terrible. Most couldn't care less what you think of them. Most of them are entirely deluded and believe they are the greatest sales people to walk the earth. Most. Not all. Recruiter bashing is easy however remaining professional is more appropriate.
markyc 13y ago
"the word No doesn't get processed by a salesperson the way normal people process it" how true. don't all self professed sales gurus teach that you need to get through 7 "No"-s to get a "Yes"
christoph 13y ago
THIS. We put a job advert up on LinkedIn recently. It said in big bold capital letters at the very top "Absolutely no agencies/recruiters" Guess what? We got 50+ calls from job agencies in under 1 week. Some, multiple times, even after we politely told them we were not interested and not to contact us again. My only guess is that people working in recruitment have targets to hit in terms of number of calls to make each day and they'll try and hit that target anyway possible.
- Peroni 13y ago
  My only guess is that people working in recruitment have targets to hit in terms of number of calls to make each day and they'll try and hit that target anyway possible A guess that happens to be 100% accurate. Recruiters are targeted on a huge number of factors, primarily the number of jobs they fill obviously but also the number of new clients acquired, number of clients contacted, candidate contacts, client visits, etc. It's a long list.

philwelch 13y ago

"I'm just trying to make a living for my family" is the last refuge of telemarketers, car dealers, and the assholes who ship me junk mail every week that goes straight from the mailbox to the recycle bin.

bradgessler 13y ago

Peroni, I notice you're a recruiter. Shouldn't you be distancing yourself from clearly bad recruiting practices?

Peroni 13y ago
I'm an internal recruiter not an agency recruiter. A distinction I'm very defensive about! I've built my reputation on attacking poor recruiting practices and I agree that this particular recruiter's approach is poor, however I believe the response is significantly worse.

cowls 13y ago

Yes, it seems being contacted by a lot of recruiters has really gone to this guys head. This is incredibly unprofessional, a simple polite, "Im not currently looking" would be suffice. The recruiter doesnt need his life story.

mattbillenstein 13y ago
Does spam go to your head? I usually reply "I'm not looking right now - thx" to principles - ie, Google or Facebook or some internal recruiter trying to hire people. I get it, I've used recruiters in the past, and when done right, they're a valuable tool. This is spam, if you spam me, expect the pointy end of something. And it's not like I cursed her up and down and sideways or anything - just giving her a piece of my mind.

Isofarro 13y ago

"Wrong. 1 reply of "I'm not interested, please don't contact me again." is normal speak." No. This is no different to spam, it is an unsolicited email for commercial gain for the sender. What you are advocating is that a recipient opts out of an unsolicited contact. That doesn't scale. It places the onus on clearing up the mess on the recipient. The presence of an email address on the web doesn't confer the right to reply for the sender. It cannot be considered opting into anything. And as such, it should not require a recipient to opt-out. Don't assume silence means consent.