3 ms·
p-B11 fusion would be the holy grail for energy, since ordinary Hydrogen is very common, Boron-11 is the most common isotope, and Boron itself is fairly common
by InclinedPlane 13y ago
p-B11 fusion would be the holy grail for energy, since ordinary Hydrogen is very common, Boron-11 is the most common isotope, and Boron itself is fairly common on Earth (annual production is around a million tonnes). Moreover, the reactor design could be remarkably simple and highly efficient. Power could be directly converted from the plasma to electricity without a need to use heat exchangers or steam turbines. Additionally, the low neutron flux would make the reactor remarkably safe, as would the fusion products (primarily ordinary Helium).
However, as far away as D-T fusion energy is today p-B11 is even farther. p-B11 fusion requires plasma temperatures 10 times higher than D-T fusion, making it that much more difficult to build devices capable of inducing fusion. Worse yet, at those conditions the bremsstrahlung radiation loses using conventional plasma confinement technologies would be significantly higher than the power produced by the fusion reactions. What that means is that for every watt produced by fusion that might be converted to a fraction of a watt of useful power there would be more than a watt of power radiated away in x-rays and gamma rays, meaning that it would cool faster than it could be heated by fusion energy, rendering it useless as a power source.
In short, p-B11 fusion requires the development of novel approaches to plasma confinement and ramping up their capabilities up to and orders of magnitude beyond what we've done with tokomaks et al today. To say that this would be an enormously challenging scientific and technical enterprise would be a gross understatement.
Nevertheless, it very much does warrant continued research. No matter the difficulty there's no way to get to a destination without spending the time on the road there.
- DennisP 13y agoAll true but several groups are attempting it. LPP has published a paper in Physics of Plasmas showing they'd reached 1.8 billion degrees C, well over the minimum required for boron fusion. They claim that bremsstrahlung is suppressed at the extreme magnetic fields they generate, and that this effect is well-known to astrophysicists. There are also papers claiming that side ignition of boron fuel is possible with a 60-petawatt picosecond laser, about six times bigger than our largest today. Tri-Alpha is also attempting boron fusion: http://nextbigfuture.com/2013/06/tri-alpha-energy-review.html http://nextbigfuture.com/2013/06/tri-alpha-energy-review.htm...
- XorNot 13y agoThe perspective to keep in mind is "attempting" is the same thing we're doing with a lot of these things. I wouldn't want to be picking winners yet.
- DennisP 13y agoYes and I think most people researching alternative fusion methods would agree. The LPP guys certainly do. It's arguably unfortunate that we picked tokamaks as the winner quite a while ago. LPP is trying to get scientists to sign a letter supporting a broad range of research, from other approaches to tokamaks (like the recently-cancelled Alcator C-Mod) to completely different devices. Several promising projects were cancelled in 2011, like MIT's levitated dipole, and non-tokamak approaches have struggled to get funding for decades. http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/index.php?option=com_lyftenbloggie&view=entry&year=2013&month=09&day=23&id=105%3Aopen-letter-on-fusion&Itemid=90 http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/index.php?option=c...