4 ms·
If anyone has seen my posts in the past, you'll know that I'm not a fan of the ACA, but disregarding that, let me be the first to say that this probably isn't t
by bmelton 13y ago
If anyone has seen my posts in the past, you'll know that I'm not a fan of the ACA, but disregarding that, let me be the first to say that this probably isn't the fault (or, at least not solely the fault) of those building the web frontends.
In Maryland, our exchange website is poorly designed and written, just on the frontend (I obviously can't see the backend), but at the same time, all of the frontend issues could be fixed with a clever caching scheme.
Where the real bottleneck almost certainly lies is when the system takes your user submitted data and has to post it into what is surely an old, legacy federal system so that it can verify your identity. That old legacy system may have seen upgrades in preparation for this, but probably not -- even so, there's simply no way to prepare for the onslaught of users accessing (indirectly) what was certain to have been an isolated, government-only database in the past.
- mlinksva 13y ago> I obviously can't see the backend You can't see what's running at the moment of course, but why shouldn't you expect to be able to see the source? Why are new government IT projects closed source?
- bmelton 13y agoInteresting you mention that. I saw this the other day, and was debating whether or not it was (at least the frontend of) the actual running site: https://github.com/CMSgov/healthcare.gov https://github.com/CMSgov/healthcare.gov
- integraton 13y agoThis is only the content site, not the marketplace. See: "This project does not include any source code for the Federal Health Insurance Marketplace (the online systems located under www.healthcare.gov/marketplace."