3 ms·

Hmm, I don't know. I like my smoke detectors to be as simple as possible. Complex tech that might cause some kind of hang and failure in critical devices gives

• JoeAltmaier 13y ago
  Normally I'd agree, but the current crop of devices demonstrably have exactly that problem - they get disabled because of chronic false-positives. So some improvement/complexity is called for.
  • bitdestroyer 13y ago
    I would also agree about limiting the complexity, but I do think there's something to be said for the benefits of having the additional technologies the Protect offers, coupled with the ability for the Nest team to update them ([1]) as improvements are found. It seems to me that as usage increases, the Nest team can use that data to come up with additional features that could incrementally increase the safety of your home over time, however small that increase might be. The obvious caveat being that the updates need to be safe as well, but I think the long tail of a product like this could be increased safety over time, which to me sounds attractive. Not to mention the benefits this adds if you already use a Nest. We have two in our home and the ability for it to know more about the temperature in different rooms is something I've wanted since we installed them. [1] http://support.nest.com/article/Do-I-need-Wi-Fi-to-install-and-use-my-Nest-Protect http://support.nest.com/article/Do-I-need-Wi-Fi-to-install-a...