5 ms·

I, for one, am disgusted and outraged by this blatant objectification of men's bodies. This is almost as bad as that disgusting Titstare app.

by woah 13y ago

quarterto 13y ago
I can only assume this is satire. At least, I hope, this is satire. This is a store-bought dildo with an interesting hack added on.
- kristofferR 13y ago
  It's obviously satire, everyone knows that only female bodies are subject to the natural instinct of objectification.
vezzy-fnord 13y ago
Oh, you do have a lot to learn about teledildonics, my friend! It is the future of sexual expression. Probably. Unfortunately?
d0m 13y ago
I Agree. The organizers should be ashamed and should publicly apologize. This is NOT acceptable and shouldn't be tolerated in our society. The prize should be taken back from the participants and be given to a men sexually abused charity. err, just kidding, I thought it was pretty damn cool and a very nice hack.
mistercow 13y ago
Your satire fails in its comparison. Nobody (well not nobody, but epsilon people) would claim that a hi-tech masturbatory device for men (not that men couldn't use this device) was sexist, so long as its purpose was described tastefully and objectively. This is obviously also intended to a be a functional device that actually serves its purported purpose. TitStare was simply a crass joke. So no, there is no comparison between this and TitStare. But nice try.
lilz0r 13y ago
sorry but this is not like titstare, not even a little bit. maybe you are just grouping all NSFW hackathon projects superficially into the same category? titstare is an app that makes it easier for men to objectify women in an unwanted way. what we created is a device that makes it easier for couples to enjoy each other consensually, even in long distance relationships.
yread 13y ago
If this is satire, it is a bad satire. You don't really understand what objectifying is about, check out this article http://plover.net/~bonds/objectification.html http://plover.net/~bonds/objectification.html Oh and before you get defensive, both me and the author of the article are men

I, for one, am disgusted and outraged by this blatant objectification of men's bodies. This is almost as bad as that disgusting Titstare app.

by woah 13y ago

I, for one, am disgusted and outraged by this blatant objectification of men's bodies. This is almost as bad as that disgusting Titstare app.

quarterto 13y ago

I can only assume this is satire. At least, I hope, this is satire. This is a store-bought dildo with an interesting hack added on.

kristofferR 13y ago
It's obviously satire, everyone knows that only female bodies are subject to the natural instinct of objectification.

vezzy-fnord 13y ago

Oh, you do have a lot to learn about teledildonics, my friend! It is the future of sexual expression. Probably. Unfortunately?

d0m 13y ago

I Agree. The organizers should be ashamed and should publicly apologize. This is NOT acceptable and shouldn't be tolerated in our society. The prize should be taken back from the participants and be given to a men sexually abused charity. err, just kidding, I thought it was pretty damn cool and a very nice hack.

mistercow 13y ago

Your satire fails in its comparison. Nobody (well not nobody, but epsilon people) would claim that a hi-tech masturbatory device for men (not that men couldn't use this device) was sexist, so long as its purpose was described tastefully and objectively. This is obviously also intended to a be a functional device that actually serves its purported purpose. TitStare was simply a crass joke. So no, there is no comparison between this and TitStare. But nice try.

lilz0r 13y ago

sorry but this is not like titstare, not even a little bit. maybe you are just grouping all NSFW hackathon projects superficially into the same category? titstare is an app that makes it easier for men to objectify women in an unwanted way. what we created is a device that makes it easier for couples to enjoy each other consensually, even in long distance relationships.

yread 13y ago

If this is satire, it is a bad satire. You don't really understand what objectifying is about, check out this article http://plover.net/~bonds/objectification.html http://plover.net/~bonds/objectification.html Oh and before you get defensive, both me and the author of the article are men