5 ms·
In SR1 wasn't an additional feature of having the money go through a centralized party that neither party had access to the others BC wallet id? Would doing it
by pdenya 13y ago
In SR1 wasn't an additional feature of having the money go through a centralized party that neither party had access to the others BC wallet id? Would doing it this way negatively impact anonymity?
- kcorbitt 13y agoMaybe bitcoins could be moved around in an onion-routing scheme similar to Tor. You might be able to see that a particular wallet ended up with the money but it wouldn't necessarily be possible to see where they came from originally.
- bascule 13y agoSee Matt Green's Zerocoin concept: http://zerocoin.org/ http://zerocoin.org/
- chapel 13y agoThat centralized party is a weak link, and in the case of SR, compromised all BC wallet ids that were used as well as the bitcoins stored.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- GigabyteCoin 13y agoZeroCoin is probably the only way a system like this would work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin