3 ms·
You said that, but it is not true. If there are any lies in the post you would easily be able to identify one, and everyone would be able to see whether you we
by gibwell 13y ago
You said that, but it is not true. If there are any lies in the post you would easily be able to identify one, and everyone would be able to see whether you were right or not.
You are the one who called Dilger a liar but you have not identified any lies he has told. The burden is on you to provide evidence for your accusation.
Merely linking to one of his pieces and saying 'he's a liar' does not prove anything.
Just because you dislike his opinions does not make him a liar.
- Oletros 13y agoAs I said, if you can't see with a quick grasp, an they are very evident, it is worthless arguing. You can believe what you want, facts will remain, problem with Digler are not his ridiculous opinions.
- gibwell 13y agoNope. You can't find a faulty fact because they aren't any. If you could, you'd present one. You're obviously just blustering.