3 ms·
You can do more - please pick out just one lie or flawed fact from that piece. I honestly don't see any, but that's because the piece is an unreadable screed o
by gibwell 13y ago
You can do more - please pick out just one lie or flawed fact from that piece.
I honestly don't see any, but that's because the piece is an unreadable screed of childish invective that doesn't involve many facts. Not because Dilger is lying.
- Oletros 13y agoI said, if you think Dilger is a good reporter and you can't see any wrong fact and lie in that post I can't do nothing. Well, perhaps you also think that Appleinsider is a good site
- gibwell 13y agoYou said that, but it is not true. If there are any lies in the post you would easily be able to identify one, and everyone would be able to see whether you were right or not. You are the one who called Dilger a liar but you have not identified any lies he has told. The burden is on you to provide evidence for your accusation. Merely linking to one of his pieces and saying 'he's a liar' does not prove anything. Just because you dislike his opinions does not make him a liar.
- Oletros 13y agoAs I said, if you can't see with a quick grasp, an they are very evident, it is worthless arguing. You can believe what you want, facts will remain, problem with Digler are not his ridiculous opinions.
- gibwell 13y agoNope. You can't find a faulty fact because they aren't any. If you could, you'd present one. You're obviously just blustering.