Now you're talking about consequences and penalties, which has nothing to do with the original statement relating purely to assurances and validation and authen

Now you're talking about consequences and penalties, which has nothing to do with the original statement relating purely to assurances and validation and authentication of claims. You can argue on top of that a paramilitary organisation must exist so that such findings have any real world impact. Once again though that was not in the content of the original statement, and you might awkwardly find yourself supporting people trying to give teeth to what they believe to be extremely important things in various other ways you may not immediately see the parity with, but nonetheless spring from the exact same premise of implicitly desirable violent deterrence. For example, engaging the services of a professional killer to prevent a large number of customers who have trusted you and your business from being kidnapped and held in rape cages for an extended period of time.