4 ms·
The ability to play offline is far down the list of improvements they could make to this game. For a start, the inability to create any meaningful regions means
by _mulder_ 13y ago
The ability to play offline is far down the list of improvements they could make to this game. For a start, the inability to create any meaningful regions means players just end up building a few specialised 'neighbourhoods' separated by a couple of miles of grass or forest.
The highways and railways only seem to link up 4 neighbourhoods at a time so your 'Metropolis' ends up being more like 4 seperate, non-connected towns, each consisting of 4 little neighbourhoods.
EA massively missed the goal posts on SC5. Players enjoyed crafting a whole world of their own, micromanaging it down to the nth degree. I didn't spend hours and hours playing SC1,2000,3 & 4 thinking "if only my city could be smaller and it was compulsory to play with strangers who don't share my design ideas".
The only thing they got right, in my opinion, was the graphic refresh and bendy-roads.
I did buy the game when it came out, even had to buy the Windows 8 upgrade pack to play it! I don't know what I was more disappointed with, SC5 or Windows 8. I can't remember to be honest because, after 1 week of playing the game, I booted back into Linux and haven't restarted since.
- MikusR 13y agoWhat Windows 8 has to do with SimCity?
- _mulder_ 13y agoI didn't fancy running it on clunky Vista and my copy of Windows 7 was still the Beta version, so not legal anymore. I actually thought I'd go and buy Windows 7 but no.... you can't buy Windows 7 anymore, so I had to settle for 8! As stated, I use Linux day-to-day.
- ChikkaChiChi 13y agoIn a way, everything. Both are prime examples of corporate desires to push something new on the customer, despite the harbingers of doom that preceded their launch. Coincidentally, both seem to also be scaling back some of these "mandatory" decisions because the market has rejected them on a massive scale.