> Addressed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6505227 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6505227 False dichotomy. There is no technical debt. Both Ruby 1

> Addressed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6505227 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6505227 False dichotomy. There is no technical debt. Both Ruby 1.9.3 and Ruby 2 are functional and used in production. It will take some time to totally move to 2, and when that happens, there will be applications on different release versions of 2. I don't want to wait for os packaging to use a new ruby release, and I don't want to be forced by the packaging to use a particular version(older or newer). > I don't work in a Ruby shop anymore, but I'd look at Bundler Um. I use Bundler along with rvm. > maintaining multiple gemsets on the same machine is an antipattern that points to technical debt. Having a restriction of not more than one app on one machine is as stupid as it gets.