3 ms·
Neither Google nor WA are good at understanding the semantics behind a natural language question - something that Watson has been designed to do. Also, showing
by m_mueller 13y ago
Neither Google nor WA are good at understanding the semantics behind a natural language question - something that Watson has been designed to do. Also, showing the percentage of certainty, as they do for medical queries, could be useful for many fields, particularly for academic research, given that they include citations, something that should be easy to include. I'm seeing Watson rather as a tool that could make a dent in specialist fields and trickle down from there, as the hardware to do that becomes cheaper.
- chrislomax 13y agoAnd I completely agree with this, there is definitely a niche. Very much in the same way that Wolfram has a niche. It's never going to replace search but it definitely plays an important part in the way we look for information. If anything, IBM could replace / merge with Wolfram
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]