4 ms·

No, he is comparing an ancient system (ethiopian multiplication) with an even more ancient one (just fucking counting) and calling it stupid. As far as I can t

• anextio 13y ago
  That's a fine argument with 7 times 34, because you only need 7 holes of 34 stones. But it breaks down when multiplying much larger numbers, because the number of holes you need increases by N. With this addition system, you only need log(N) holes. The system exists to remove cumbersome aspects of multiplying large numbers by counting. Consider 34x34. While one fellow is out digging 34 holes, making sure not to make a mistake, or finding a piece of wood that has 34 holes marked in it, the other guy never needs more than 10 holes if his numbers are less than 1024. This keeps his working area small, and he can see all of it at the same time. It's less cumbersome this way.
  • jlgreco 13y ago
    I'm not sure how you think "counting" works... As described, the Ethiopian Method would take far more stones and far more time. The larger the numbers you are working with, the larger the discrepancy.
• ekm2 13y ago
  The last time I checked Combinatorics was all "just fucking counting" and I am sure you will agree that it is not stupid.