3 ms·
uh - quicksilver anyone? http://quicksilver.en.softonic.com/mac http://quicksilver.en.softonic.com/mac
by skinner696 17y ago
uh - quicksilver anyone? http://quicksilver.en.softonic.com/mac http://quicksilver.en.softonic.com/mac
- Timothee 17y agoIf I remember correctly, the main developer of QuickSilver (whose name I can't remember) was hired by Google some time ago. It wouldn't be surprising if he was involved with this.
- travisjeffery 17y agoNicholas Jitkoff is his name, Alcor is his handle. He is employed by Google and is involved with it.
- fiaz 17y agoThe question really boils down to whether or not I want to ditch QS for QSB...any thoughts on which one might be better? One thing I've found frustrating with QS is that some of the functionality that worked in Tiger is no longer functional in Leopard.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- amr 17y agoQuicksilver is still better because it is more than a program launcher. QS provides a wide array of tools at your fingertips like a calculator, terminal commands, email commands, image manipulation etc.
- alabut 17y agoRead the blog post all the way through: "Once you've found the result you want, we wanted you to be able to DO something with it. To find out what you can do, select a result and press the tab key or the right arrow on the keyboard."
- whughes 17y agoOriginal sites: http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver (alcor's site, who's now with Google and working on the QSB) http://code.google.com/p/blacktree-alchemy/ http://code.google.com/p/blacktree-alchemy/ (Google Code for QS) I try to avoid the shareware download sites whenever possible; they're virtually useless these days and can be a breeding ground for adware. On the topic of the Google QSB, I'm going to give this a test run; I couldn't get used to Butler and I hosed my QS installation, so I've been looking for a good alternative.