If I should put it simpler, in terms that is easy for you: You accept military solutions for combatants (combatants or in e.g. logistics) in conflicts with sta

If I should put it simpler, in terms that is easy for you: You accept military solutions for combatants (combatants or in e.g. logistics) in conflicts with states. There are often no simple categories as either countries or individuals. There is a big grey area, just consider deniability (e.g. should Hezbollah be seen as another branch of the Iranian rep guard? A proxy? Does anyone know, except maybe the Hezbollah boss?). So there will be cases where military solutions are relevant, even when it strictly aren't any countries involved (at least officially). In the Middle East, this is especially obvious with more or less clans controlling countries. For another example, Pakistan grows and deploys terrorist groups as if they were special forces (while vehemently denying it). So the problem here is you building a moral standpoint of a simplified world view -- X wasn't in a declared war, so it is murder. It just isn't that simple, says 5 minutes of thought.