3 ms·
OT, but I've been seeing this around a lot lately. It's "toe the line", and not "tow the line": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line https://en.wikipedia
by shrikant 13y ago
OT, but I've been seeing this around a lot lately.
It's "toe the line", and not "tow the line": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line
- joe5150 13y agoIt truly does not matter.
- daned 13y agoWords matter. source: George Carlin
- joe5150 13y agoOy vey. I don't know what George Carlin has to say on the subject of idiomatic constructions in English, but if we lived in a world where phrases could only be used in the most literal understandings of the literal definitions of their component words, idioms like "toe the line" wouldn't exist in the first place. The handy thing about it being an idiom is that it works even when the literal meaning, the context, and the history are forgotten. The difference between "toe" and "tow" is nil in terms of how it affects the meaning of the phrase, since the meaning of the phrase is not derived from adding together the meanings of the words.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- pydave 13y agoThink this: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZhvlxGTfYXo/TYLtUko9fwI/AAAAAAAAA2c/BKVogH-O9Ks/s1600/wednesday3.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZhvlxGTfYXo/TYLtUko9fwI/AAAAAAAAA2... -- toe on a line is easy to imagine. Instead of this: http://www.glossophilia.org/wp-content/uploads/towline.jpg http://www.glossophilia.org/wp-content/uploads/towline.jpg -- towing an oceanliner? Does that make any sense?