3 ms·
>that's exactly what we should be doing with false marketing claims, or else we end up with MongoDB all over again Sorry, but I don't get the reference to Mong
by ternaryoperator 13y ago
>that's exactly what we should be doing with false marketing claims, or else we end up with MongoDB all over again
Sorry, but I don't get the reference to MongoDB. What happened there?
- justinsb 13y agoI was suggesting that MongoDB's marketing claims initially went unchecked here and generally. It seems a lot of people assumed that others had done the due-diligence for them. They started using it not knowing that it was not very concurrent, that the default transaction mode allowed data-loss, that it was slow when run in safe-mode, that it was not reliable unless replicated etc. (And these were all design issues, not implementation bugs). A lot of those people were pretty badly burned, particularly in the early days.
- ternaryoperator 13y agoAh, I was unaware of that bit of history.