4 ms·

Why You Should Try a Tiling Window Manager

46 points by Adrock 13y ago

joeframbach 13y ago
I kind of use tiling in OSX. Most of my apps are running full-screen on two monitors, and I swipe across desktops to get to other apps. Of course, I am able to stack apps on top of eachother, but for the most part I don't. I have a desktop for sublime, a desktop for sequel pro, a desktop for a browser. In the event I need to look at two things at once, it's easy enough to drag things around.
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
- ajross 13y ago
  This isn't really the same thing. Virtual desktops have been around for decades now, and people have been using them like this (with or without two physical displays) forever. It works for the kind of full-screenable "apps" like you mention. It works poorly for smaller tools: what if you want to have your editor and a console side-by-side, and still view a chat window below that. And of course you can do all that stuff with regular window UIs too, so that isn't really the essence of a tiling window manager either. As I see it, the real thing that distinguishes tiled environments isn't the "tiling" at all, it's the keyboard-first navigation UI that the tiling enables. And even though I don't actually use these things (I've tried now and again), that's something I see a lot of value in.
eggoa 13y ago
At work I spend all day in Windows 7. The best thing I've found is WinSplit Revolution, which is nice but leaves a lot to be desired. (Unfortunately switching to Linux just isn't going to happen, for a number of reasons. But I get to use dwm at home, which I really like.)
chrisweekly 13y ago
I LOVE Divvy on OSX. http://mizage.com/divvy/ http://mizage.com/divvy/
dexen 13y ago
I'm happy with tiled windows in Acme (editor/IDE) for daily work. The layouting algorithm (a simple one) does the right thing most of the time :^) My usual mode is Acme maximized on one screen, and browser, email and IM spread on the other. See it in action in rsc's screencast: http://research.swtch.com/acme http://research.swtch.com/acme
- rkowalick 13y ago
  I really wanted to like it, but the lack of syntax highlighting drove me nuts.
  - dexen 13y ago
    Partly matter of taste, partly matter of code formatting style. Used to be big on syntax highlighting for years, but now I prefer mono. When needed, double-click highlights area between matching parens/brackets/braces/tags.
  - RBerenguel 13y ago
    I got used to it (at least for go.) I use acme for go and at the same time a full-screened emacs for html/css (and gnus) at the same time. Works far better than expected, speed wise.
- RBerenguel 13y ago
  Full screen acme and the rest full-screened in "other window", one cmd-tab away. I try not to IM while working :)
drcode 13y ago
Anyone know if "Notion" works as well in the latest Ubuntu releases as suggested by the author of the post? (i.e. XMondad got jacked pretty badly in Ubuntu 13.04 and now requires lots of low level linux voodoo.)
- boothead 13y ago
  Yeah, I got bitten by that too. There's a list kicking round of all the individual packages required to install to make a haskell-platform-alike. If you want I can dig it out of my ansible config.
- tomrod 13y ago
  Shucks. I haven't upgraded yet to 13.04. Should I skip it on by for 13.10 when it comes out? If not, what voodoo did you do?
  - drcode 13y ago
    None- I just reverted to 12.x and stayed there. Reading online though, some folks who knew what they were doing fared better though.
yarou 13y ago
I've used awesome before, and I was quite impressed. Once you get the hang of shortcuts, you tend to be vastly more productive than if you were using a traditional or compositing wm. I grew up with a compositing WM, but the transition was easy enough. I'm curious if the advent of mobile devices (i.e. smartphone, tablet, etc) would lead one to choose tiling WMs over the traditional kind.
- gizmo686 13y ago
  It looks like Windows 8 's metro interface is a basic tiling WM. It isn't very featured, but it can show multiple apps at the same time, and will automatically split the screen between them (without overlap).
  - yarou 13y ago
    Agreed, totally forgot about Metro.
conroy 13y ago
I use SizeUp and have been very happy with it.
- leetrout 13y ago
  This! +100 this. I use SizeUp to make up for the windows 7 feature I loved the most and being able to quickly scale and tile windows with keyboard shortcuts. Works great and definitely worth the money. http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/ http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/
thinkersilver 13y ago
I'm really surprised that he left out i3wm. It's lightweight and the tiling placement is surprisingly intuitive and simple. Here's the Google Talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnYN2CTb1hM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnYN2CTb1hM
- hkhanna 13y ago
  I tried i3wm, and I really wanted to like it. It's got the simplest configuration I've seen in a tiling window manager and it seemed very low maintenance. Unfortunately, it's got some bugs, at least in the version packaged with Debian Wheezy, which ended up being a deal-breaker for me. One of the bugs is that when a container is vertically split, true transparency (with xcompmgr) gets messed up and you see a bunch of garbage in the background of the client. I've also used AwesomeWM and xmonad, but both were too difficult to configure, especially because I don't know Haskell or Lua and I didn't want to learn a new language just to configure my wm, especially because I wouldn't use the languages for other purposes, and so I'd promptly forget the syntax and would have to re-learn it every time I wanted to change something in my wm. I ended up switching to Openbox, and I'm still trying to decide whether it is for me.
- sliverstorm 13y ago
  i3wm is the most difficult to get used to, from what I've seen. As always, more configuration (in this case of window layout) makes for steeper learning curves.
  - stormbrew 13y ago
    On the contrary i3 is the only one I've started using and stuck with. The configuration is simple, the commands not horribly difficult to use or understand, and it's pretty damn good at dealing with multimon, even dealing with randr display names natively.
zdw 13y ago
If you're on OS X, I've found Slate to be the best option: https://github.com/jigish/slate https://github.com/jigish/slate It's open source, has a simple text file based config, and is generally more configurable than most other similar tools.
- Zombieball 13y ago
  +1 vote for me. Slate has been great. Additionally if you are using a Matrox device to get multiple screen support on your Mac, Slate comes in real handy. Rather than get 2 virtual screens the Matrox devices create one virtual screen that spans 2 monitors. Tiling managers like Slate are super helpful for snapping programs to monitors in cases like thos.
  - stcredzero 13y ago
    I used to use Divvy for this purpose.
- abhinavg 13y ago
  In case you're interested, Xmonad has partial support for OSX: https://github.com/xmonad/osxmonad https://github.com/xmonad/osxmonad
jared314 13y ago
I've settled on ShiftIt [1], which gives me more partial desktop control at a good price (free). There was a good post, a while ago, on the various options for OSX [2]. I've also noticed that, because I use a widescreen and split my web browsers into two columns less-than 1000px wide, every Twitter Bootstrap site thinks i'm on a mobile device and collapses the grid layout. [1] https://github.com/fikovnik/ShiftIt https://github.com/fikovnik/ShiftIt [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4059820 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4059820
CJefferson 13y ago
I currently use xmonad, along with the gnome top-bar to get applets, network configuration, etc. I have found this the easiest way to move into tiling window managers. It still annoys that tiling window managers all seem designed to be hard to use to configure, almost as a matter of principle. I see no reason that a tiling window manager can't still be easy to use (for example, I use the mouse as much with xmonad as I can, and would like to be able to use it more).
- gizmo686 13y ago
  I think the problem is that tiling window managers have never been mainstream, so they are all targeted at people who would go out of there way to install a tiling window manger. By contrast, even non-mainstream composting window managers have the benefit of seeing how the mainstream ones do things to be usable (and have had more effort put into them in general). Another problem is that tiling window managers are (almost?) never part of a complete desktop environment. They may pay lip service to this (in the form of a basic start-menu type thing), but for the most part they are simply window managers. With composting window managers, no one (except the developer) thinks of the WM by itself.
  - rob05c 13y ago
    > a complete desktop environment I agree. I wish more Tiling WMs came with a GUI application launcher, better mouse support for moving and resizing, login screens, etc. Not everyone uses a Tiling WM because they're a masochist musophobe.
    - gizmo686 13y ago
      I think you are looking at it from the wrong angle. The WM is just a component of a complete desktop environment. Instead of making a Tiling WM that comes with the kitchen sink, we should make a Tiling WM that simply replaces the WM on the pre-existing, and fully featured, desktop environment you already have. Technically speaking, this is not challenging. For example, to make Awesome the defualt window manager in gnome, one need only run: "gconftool-2 --type string --set /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager awesome" Obviously, this is a large barrier for a casual user wanting to try a tiling window manager. However, if WM installer changed that setting instead of just creating its own desktop environment, then we would not be having this problem.
fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
An article about window managers with no screenshots?
- keithpeter 13y ago
  Perhaps the time element is important in evaluating a workflow so I think what we actually need is a video.
seniorsassycat 13y ago
I'm not familiar with notion or ion3, but I've used all of the other tilling managers listed. I really like AwesomeWM as a starting point because it comes sanely configured, and does not rely on haskell like Xmonad. Awesome is configured via Lua scripts, Lua might not be the most popular language but it's easier to pick up than Haskell and has a smaller dependence base. Besides notion/ion3, which I am not familiar with, all these tilling managers are automatic. You select a layout directive like - place all windows horizontally, - place all windows in a grid, - place one window filling 2/3rd the screen and the rest stacked in the remaining 1/3rd There are other tilling wm's like i3, wmii, bspwm, and herbstluftwm which are manual tilling managers. i3 and wmii are probably the best ones to start with, but herbstluftwm is my favorite. With manual tillers you typically split the workspace into multiple frames and windows are automatically arranged in those frames. Here is an impressive gif of bspwm, a manual tilling window manager [0], and here is the reddit thread where the creater talks about his configurations [1] [0] http://paste.unixhub.net/index.php/NlKe/ http://paste.unixhub.net/index.php/NlKe/ [1] http://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/1m0ea1/arch_bspwm_why_bspwm_watch_this_screencast_and/ http://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/1m0ea1/arch_bspwm_...
brassybadger 13y ago
Switching to DWM was the best thing that could have happened to my desktop. I rarely use the mouse ever since.
davexunit 13y ago
StumpWM is really cool. It uses a similar keybinding system to Emacs and is extensible via Common Lisp.
kryptiskt 13y ago
On Linux i tend to use dwm (and dmenu), it doesn't have many features but then I don't really want anything more than a quick and easy way to fill a couple of workspaces with terminals, editors and browsers. On Windows 8, WinKey + Left or Right are handy shortcuts.
logicallee 13y ago
Oh Windows 3.1, you were right all along. :(
z0r 13y ago
The combination of xmonad, dmenu and emacs --daemon has brought me great joy. The way I use computers has changed completely since starting down the tiling window manager road. It's a shame that getting the configuration for them right can be such a pain, but it has been well worth the trouble!
- nilved 13y ago
  No doubt. I've used Arch and awesome for a few months now and it's remarkable. The increase in efficiency and usability is made most apparent when I need to use OS X again. I only started using dmenu yesterday and I've already written a few scripts I've found very handy: passphrase autotyping[0] and music playing[1] to name two. [0] https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-pass-autotype https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-... [1] https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-mpc https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-...
andyl 13y ago
xmonad => terminator => tmux => vim tiling inception
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
sliverstorm 13y ago
Reasons why you shouldn't try a tiling window manager: Well, mostly if you use tools that have a "view portal" or depend heavily on pop-out style toolboxes. The WM is constantly resizing your windows, which makes it a chore to keep everything adjusted, and pop-out style toolboxes are pretty much best at on-top usage by nature, rather than tiled. I use CAD software on a regular basis, and while I managed to make a tiling WM work for me for maybe 6 months, returning to a floating WM was a relief. If you work directly with text all day, I bet they are great, but for me...
- DSMan195276 13y ago
  Have you considered i3? It supports fully floating windows separate from the tiling, and normal pop-up windows go straight to the floating layer. It's extremely handy (As what you noted annoys me a ton with WM's like XMonad). i3 can act just like a normal floating WM if needed.
  - sliverstorm 13y ago
    i3wm was the only one I could even tolerate, and the one I used the longest. I had enough control to make toolboxes floating, and to size important windows correctly. But at the end of the day it was a chore to use and just didn't add much value. I guess what you could take away is I want/need my windows to be sized & placed specifically the way I direct, and a tiling WM is the opposite of this.
- __brian__ 13y ago
  I have been using Awesome for a couple years now, and it has a great solution to this problem. You can add a rule to a window class (MPlayer creates a window with the class "MPlayer" for example) and set the "floating" property to true. The property can of course be toggled with a keyboard shortcut which is very handy with lots of terminals.
- Adrock 13y ago
  Notion does a pretty good job of letting you mix floating and tiled windows. I do it manually by pressing Win+D, which I have bound to ioncore.detach. It's nice because all child windows that spawn from that program are floaters by default. It also lets you specify that new windows of particular programs should float by default or open in specifically named frames. I wouldn't be able to GIMP without this...
noir_lord 13y ago
I use Mint 15 XFCE on all my machines, I did try i3wm and a few others (i3wm for a couple of weeks) but it always had a couple of silly niggles on 3 screens (cursor jumping back to the middle of the screen when I tried to move it to another screen drove me crazy). I've found XFCE with the keyboard shortcuts (built-in) to tile to top,left,bottom,right,fullscreen work really well and fit my model of usage (which is mostly open new source file, split screen).
zipperhead 13y ago
Some questions from someone who likes the idea of a tiling window manager but doesn't quite see how it would work better than compositing. I'm coming at this from KDE. My top applications are: firefox, thunderbird, eclipse, sublime text, and terminator. When I'm browsing, I like to have firefox in the middle of my screen. If it's stuck off to the side somewhere or buried amongst other tabs, I'm going to hate it. How do I make that work? Eclipse is going to be full screen. I assume that's not going to be difficult. Now with all that, I get someone asking me a question via skype. How do I get notified? Currently I get a nice notification via the taskbar. Do I lose the concept of notifications? What about for widget-like things (cpu/network/etc)? Do people use conky or something like that in a tiled window?
- nilved 13y ago
  Awesome has a builtin window layout that I think you'd like: it has one program take up 80% of the screen in the center, and tiles horizontally the rest behind it. But any WM can do that either by duplicating the layout or, in the case of dynamic window managers, using floating windows. Your notifications will stay. For widgets, stick it in the menu bars or use conky -- the same options are available.
qwerta 13y ago
I use "sort of" Tiling WM. I have 4 screens in portrait mode and always maximize windows across single screen. I never have to scroll or press alt-tab. BTW: KDE and XFCE WM has some basic tiling support as well.
United857 13y ago
The funny thing is that Windows 1.0 in 1985 had a tiled manager, which was replaced in 2.0 with overlapping windows. Back to the future!
rob05c 13y ago
Eventually, you probably will stop relying on these things and do everything with the keyboard I read so much about why Tiling is Great because the Mouse is Awful. I think the mouse has its place. For writing code and text I have my hands on the keyboard—which means I also want to create and move windows with the keyboard. But when I'm in a web browser, or a game, or any number of other GUI-centric applications, my hand is already on the mouse. Which means I want a visual dropdown for launching applications, and I want to drag and resize windows with the mouse. I love my Tiling because it doesn't waste space. To me, Windowing is just silly; why would I ever want large swathes of my desktop empty, and applications overlapping each other? But I don't understand the mouse-versus-keyboard argument. I want both to control my WM with both, because I use applications with both.
- oftenwrong 13y ago
  As someone with no mouse, I agree that the mouse is a great thing. My RSI is aggravated severely by mouse usage, so I stick to the keyboard. For me, a fully-keyboard-controllable WM is essential to my career. The many programs and sites that require a mouse make my life difficult. Much of the modern computing world assumes a mouse is present. Still, even I admit the mouse is awesome. It is especially great for selecting text. It can be done on a keyboard usually, but it is not always as easy. It is nice to have options, whether to accommodate physical restrictions or just personal preference.

46 points by Adrock 13y ago

I kind of use tiling in OSX. Most of my apps are running full-screen on two monitors, and I swipe across desktops to get to other apps. Of course, I am able to stack apps on top of eachother, but for the most part I don't. I have a desktop for sublime, a desktop for sequel pro, a desktop for a browser. In the event I need to look at two things at once, it's easy enough to drag things around.

deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
ajross 13y ago
This isn't really the same thing. Virtual desktops have been around for decades now, and people have been using them like this (with or without two physical displays) forever. It works for the kind of full-screenable "apps" like you mention. It works poorly for smaller tools: what if you want to have your editor and a console side-by-side, and still view a chat window below that. And of course you can do all that stuff with regular window UIs too, so that isn't really the essence of a tiling window manager either. As I see it, the real thing that distinguishes tiled environments isn't the "tiling" at all, it's the keyboard-first navigation UI that the tiling enables. And even though I don't actually use these things (I've tried now and again), that's something I see a lot of value in.

eggoa 13y ago

At work I spend all day in Windows 7. The best thing I've found is WinSplit Revolution, which is nice but leaves a lot to be desired. (Unfortunately switching to Linux just isn't going to happen, for a number of reasons. But I get to use dwm at home, which I really like.)

chrisweekly 13y ago

I LOVE Divvy on OSX. http://mizage.com/divvy/ http://mizage.com/divvy/

dexen 13y ago

I'm happy with tiled windows in Acme (editor/IDE) for daily work. The layouting algorithm (a simple one) does the right thing most of the time :^) My usual mode is Acme maximized on one screen, and browser, email and IM spread on the other. See it in action in rsc's screencast: http://research.swtch.com/acme http://research.swtch.com/acme

rkowalick 13y ago
I really wanted to like it, but the lack of syntax highlighting drove me nuts.
- dexen 13y ago
  Partly matter of taste, partly matter of code formatting style. Used to be big on syntax highlighting for years, but now I prefer mono. When needed, double-click highlights area between matching parens/brackets/braces/tags.
- RBerenguel 13y ago
  I got used to it (at least for go.) I use acme for go and at the same time a full-screened emacs for html/css (and gnus) at the same time. Works far better than expected, speed wise.
RBerenguel 13y ago
Full screen acme and the rest full-screened in "other window", one cmd-tab away. I try not to IM while working :)

drcode 13y ago

Anyone know if "Notion" works as well in the latest Ubuntu releases as suggested by the author of the post? (i.e. XMondad got jacked pretty badly in Ubuntu 13.04 and now requires lots of low level linux voodoo.)

boothead 13y ago
Yeah, I got bitten by that too. There's a list kicking round of all the individual packages required to install to make a haskell-platform-alike. If you want I can dig it out of my ansible config.
tomrod 13y ago
Shucks. I haven't upgraded yet to 13.04. Should I skip it on by for 13.10 when it comes out? If not, what voodoo did you do?
- drcode 13y ago
  None- I just reverted to 12.x and stayed there. Reading online though, some folks who knew what they were doing fared better though.

yarou 13y ago

I've used awesome before, and I was quite impressed. Once you get the hang of shortcuts, you tend to be vastly more productive than if you were using a traditional or compositing wm. I grew up with a compositing WM, but the transition was easy enough. I'm curious if the advent of mobile devices (i.e. smartphone, tablet, etc) would lead one to choose tiling WMs over the traditional kind.

gizmo686 13y ago
It looks like Windows 8 's metro interface is a basic tiling WM. It isn't very featured, but it can show multiple apps at the same time, and will automatically split the screen between them (without overlap).
- yarou 13y ago
  Agreed, totally forgot about Metro.

conroy 13y ago

I use SizeUp and have been very happy with it.

leetrout 13y ago
This! +100 this. I use SizeUp to make up for the windows 7 feature I loved the most and being able to quickly scale and tile windows with keyboard shortcuts. Works great and definitely worth the money. http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/ http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/

thinkersilver 13y ago

I'm really surprised that he left out i3wm. It's lightweight and the tiling placement is surprisingly intuitive and simple. Here's the Google Talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnYN2CTb1hM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnYN2CTb1hM

hkhanna 13y ago
I tried i3wm, and I really wanted to like it. It's got the simplest configuration I've seen in a tiling window manager and it seemed very low maintenance. Unfortunately, it's got some bugs, at least in the version packaged with Debian Wheezy, which ended up being a deal-breaker for me. One of the bugs is that when a container is vertically split, true transparency (with xcompmgr) gets messed up and you see a bunch of garbage in the background of the client. I've also used AwesomeWM and xmonad, but both were too difficult to configure, especially because I don't know Haskell or Lua and I didn't want to learn a new language just to configure my wm, especially because I wouldn't use the languages for other purposes, and so I'd promptly forget the syntax and would have to re-learn it every time I wanted to change something in my wm. I ended up switching to Openbox, and I'm still trying to decide whether it is for me.
sliverstorm 13y ago
i3wm is the most difficult to get used to, from what I've seen. As always, more configuration (in this case of window layout) makes for steeper learning curves.
- stormbrew 13y ago
  On the contrary i3 is the only one I've started using and stuck with. The configuration is simple, the commands not horribly difficult to use or understand, and it's pretty damn good at dealing with multimon, even dealing with randr display names natively.

zdw 13y ago

If you're on OS X, I've found Slate to be the best option: https://github.com/jigish/slate https://github.com/jigish/slate It's open source, has a simple text file based config, and is generally more configurable than most other similar tools.

Zombieball 13y ago
+1 vote for me. Slate has been great. Additionally if you are using a Matrox device to get multiple screen support on your Mac, Slate comes in real handy. Rather than get 2 virtual screens the Matrox devices create one virtual screen that spans 2 monitors. Tiling managers like Slate are super helpful for snapping programs to monitors in cases like thos.
- stcredzero 13y ago
  I used to use Divvy for this purpose.
abhinavg 13y ago
In case you're interested, Xmonad has partial support for OSX: https://github.com/xmonad/osxmonad https://github.com/xmonad/osxmonad

jared314 13y ago

I've settled on ShiftIt [1], which gives me more partial desktop control at a good price (free). There was a good post, a while ago, on the various options for OSX [2]. I've also noticed that, because I use a widescreen and split my web browsers into two columns less-than 1000px wide, every Twitter Bootstrap site thinks i'm on a mobile device and collapses the grid layout. [1] https://github.com/fikovnik/ShiftIt https://github.com/fikovnik/ShiftIt [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4059820 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4059820

CJefferson 13y ago

I currently use xmonad, along with the gnome top-bar to get applets, network configuration, etc. I have found this the easiest way to move into tiling window managers. It still annoys that tiling window managers all seem designed to be hard to use to configure, almost as a matter of principle. I see no reason that a tiling window manager can't still be easy to use (for example, I use the mouse as much with xmonad as I can, and would like to be able to use it more).

gizmo686 13y ago
I think the problem is that tiling window managers have never been mainstream, so they are all targeted at people who would go out of there way to install a tiling window manger. By contrast, even non-mainstream composting window managers have the benefit of seeing how the mainstream ones do things to be usable (and have had more effort put into them in general). Another problem is that tiling window managers are (almost?) never part of a complete desktop environment. They may pay lip service to this (in the form of a basic start-menu type thing), but for the most part they are simply window managers. With composting window managers, no one (except the developer) thinks of the WM by itself.
- rob05c 13y ago
  > a complete desktop environment I agree. I wish more Tiling WMs came with a GUI application launcher, better mouse support for moving and resizing, login screens, etc. Not everyone uses a Tiling WM because they're a masochist musophobe.
  - gizmo686 13y ago
    I think you are looking at it from the wrong angle. The WM is just a component of a complete desktop environment. Instead of making a Tiling WM that comes with the kitchen sink, we should make a Tiling WM that simply replaces the WM on the pre-existing, and fully featured, desktop environment you already have. Technically speaking, this is not challenging. For example, to make Awesome the defualt window manager in gnome, one need only run: "gconftool-2 --type string --set /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager awesome" Obviously, this is a large barrier for a casual user wanting to try a tiling window manager. However, if WM installer changed that setting instead of just creating its own desktop environment, then we would not be having this problem.

fnordfnordfnord 13y ago

An article about window managers with no screenshots?

keithpeter 13y ago
Perhaps the time element is important in evaluating a workflow so I think what we actually need is a video.

seniorsassycat 13y ago

I'm not familiar with notion or ion3, but I've used all of the other tilling managers listed. I really like AwesomeWM as a starting point because it comes sanely configured, and does not rely on haskell like Xmonad. Awesome is configured via Lua scripts, Lua might not be the most popular language but it's easier to pick up than Haskell and has a smaller dependence base. Besides notion/ion3, which I am not familiar with, all these tilling managers are automatic. You select a layout directive like - place all windows horizontally, - place all windows in a grid, - place one window filling 2/3rd the screen and the rest stacked in the remaining 1/3rd There are other tilling wm's like i3, wmii, bspwm, and herbstluftwm which are manual tilling managers. i3 and wmii are probably the best ones to start with, but herbstluftwm is my favorite. With manual tillers you typically split the workspace into multiple frames and windows are automatically arranged in those frames. Here is an impressive gif of bspwm, a manual tilling window manager [0], and here is the reddit thread where the creater talks about his configurations [1] [0] http://paste.unixhub.net/index.php/NlKe/ http://paste.unixhub.net/index.php/NlKe/ [1] http://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/1m0ea1/arch_bspwm_why_bspwm_watch_this_screencast_and/ http://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/1m0ea1/arch_bspwm_...

brassybadger 13y ago

Switching to DWM was the best thing that could have happened to my desktop. I rarely use the mouse ever since.

davexunit 13y ago

StumpWM is really cool. It uses a similar keybinding system to Emacs and is extensible via Common Lisp.

kryptiskt 13y ago

On Linux i tend to use dwm (and dmenu), it doesn't have many features but then I don't really want anything more than a quick and easy way to fill a couple of workspaces with terminals, editors and browsers. On Windows 8, WinKey + Left or Right are handy shortcuts.

logicallee 13y ago

Oh Windows 3.1, you were right all along. :(

z0r 13y ago

The combination of xmonad, dmenu and emacs --daemon has brought me great joy. The way I use computers has changed completely since starting down the tiling window manager road. It's a shame that getting the configuration for them right can be such a pain, but it has been well worth the trouble!

nilved 13y ago
No doubt. I've used Arch and awesome for a few months now and it's remarkable. The increase in efficiency and usability is made most apparent when I need to use OS X again. I only started using dmenu yesterday and I've already written a few scripts I've found very handy: passphrase autotyping[0] and music playing[1] to name two. [0] https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-pass-autotype https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-... [1] https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-mpc https://github.com/devlinzed/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/dmenu-...

andyl 13y ago

xmonad => terminator => tmux => vim tiling inception

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

sliverstorm 13y ago

Reasons why you shouldn't try a tiling window manager: Well, mostly if you use tools that have a "view portal" or depend heavily on pop-out style toolboxes. The WM is constantly resizing your windows, which makes it a chore to keep everything adjusted, and pop-out style toolboxes are pretty much best at on-top usage by nature, rather than tiled. I use CAD software on a regular basis, and while I managed to make a tiling WM work for me for maybe 6 months, returning to a floating WM was a relief. If you work directly with text all day, I bet they are great, but for me...

DSMan195276 13y ago
Have you considered i3? It supports fully floating windows separate from the tiling, and normal pop-up windows go straight to the floating layer. It's extremely handy (As what you noted annoys me a ton with WM's like XMonad). i3 can act just like a normal floating WM if needed.
- sliverstorm 13y ago
  i3wm was the only one I could even tolerate, and the one I used the longest. I had enough control to make toolboxes floating, and to size important windows correctly. But at the end of the day it was a chore to use and just didn't add much value. I guess what you could take away is I want/need my windows to be sized & placed specifically the way I direct, and a tiling WM is the opposite of this.
__brian__ 13y ago
I have been using Awesome for a couple years now, and it has a great solution to this problem. You can add a rule to a window class (MPlayer creates a window with the class "MPlayer" for example) and set the "floating" property to true. The property can of course be toggled with a keyboard shortcut which is very handy with lots of terminals.
Adrock 13y ago
Notion does a pretty good job of letting you mix floating and tiled windows. I do it manually by pressing Win+D, which I have bound to ioncore.detach. It's nice because all child windows that spawn from that program are floaters by default. It also lets you specify that new windows of particular programs should float by default or open in specifically named frames. I wouldn't be able to GIMP without this...

noir_lord 13y ago

I use Mint 15 XFCE on all my machines, I did try i3wm and a few others (i3wm for a couple of weeks) but it always had a couple of silly niggles on 3 screens (cursor jumping back to the middle of the screen when I tried to move it to another screen drove me crazy). I've found XFCE with the keyboard shortcuts (built-in) to tile to top,left,bottom,right,fullscreen work really well and fit my model of usage (which is mostly open new source file, split screen).

zipperhead 13y ago

Some questions from someone who likes the idea of a tiling window manager but doesn't quite see how it would work better than compositing. I'm coming at this from KDE. My top applications are: firefox, thunderbird, eclipse, sublime text, and terminator. When I'm browsing, I like to have firefox in the middle of my screen. If it's stuck off to the side somewhere or buried amongst other tabs, I'm going to hate it. How do I make that work? Eclipse is going to be full screen. I assume that's not going to be difficult. Now with all that, I get someone asking me a question via skype. How do I get notified? Currently I get a nice notification via the taskbar. Do I lose the concept of notifications? What about for widget-like things (cpu/network/etc)? Do people use conky or something like that in a tiled window?

nilved 13y ago
Awesome has a builtin window layout that I think you'd like: it has one program take up 80% of the screen in the center, and tiles horizontally the rest behind it. But any WM can do that either by duplicating the layout or, in the case of dynamic window managers, using floating windows. Your notifications will stay. For widgets, stick it in the menu bars or use conky -- the same options are available.

qwerta 13y ago

I use "sort of" Tiling WM. I have 4 screens in portrait mode and always maximize windows across single screen. I never have to scroll or press alt-tab. BTW: KDE and XFCE WM has some basic tiling support as well.

United857 13y ago

The funny thing is that Windows 1.0 in 1985 had a tiled manager, which was replaced in 2.0 with overlapping windows. Back to the future!

rob05c 13y ago

Eventually, you probably will stop relying on these things and do everything with the keyboard I read so much about why Tiling is Great because the Mouse is Awful. I think the mouse has its place. For writing code and text I have my hands on the keyboard—which means I also want to create and move windows with the keyboard. But when I'm in a web browser, or a game, or any number of other GUI-centric applications, my hand is already on the mouse. Which means I want a visual dropdown for launching applications, and I want to drag and resize windows with the mouse. I love my Tiling because it doesn't waste space. To me, Windowing is just silly; why would I ever want large swathes of my desktop empty, and applications overlapping each other? But I don't understand the mouse-versus-keyboard argument. I want both to control my WM with both, because I use applications with both.

oftenwrong 13y ago
As someone with no mouse, I agree that the mouse is a great thing. My RSI is aggravated severely by mouse usage, so I stick to the keyboard. For me, a fully-keyboard-controllable WM is essential to my career. The many programs and sites that require a mouse make my life difficult. Much of the modern computing world assumes a mouse is present. Still, even I admit the mouse is awesome. It is especially great for selecting text. It can be done on a keyboard usually, but it is not always as easy. It is nice to have options, whether to accommodate physical restrictions or just personal preference.