4 ms·
It's flagrant now that we know the story. There's no argument there. It was not so clear when the story first broke. I think the whole point of this is the leng
by jm4 17y ago
It's flagrant now that we know the story. There's no argument there. It was not so clear when the story first broke. I think the whole point of this is the lengths one has to go to just to get a clear answer.
Not to mention, they had a service specifically designed for what he was doing. They easily could have converted him over to that one instead of cutting him off with nothing more than a vague, canned email about violating terms of service.
This is a bad way to treat customers any way you look at it. I think it's important to treat all customers well-- even the ones you're ending a relationship with.
- bartl 17y ago>Not to mention, they had a service specifically designed for what he was doing. But only after they kicked him off.
- stanleydrew 17y agoIt was not so clear when the story first broke. That's because he broke the story himself! Of course he kept it unclear in order to draw more sympathy.