3 ms·
The thing i don't like about articles like this, is that there seems to be a cadre of haters out there explicitly bent on tearing Google down unjustly. There a
by knowtheory 17y ago
The thing i don't like about articles like this, is that there seems to be a cadre of haters out there explicitly bent on tearing Google down unjustly.
There are things that i criticize Google upon (the capriciousness of algorithmically generated decisions, say on flagging Google Checkout accounts), but the stuff that articles like this point out are intentionally bad indicators.
The fact that you are being sued, does not indicate that you are a monopoly. It means that someone has enough political cover for the government to go after you. Both Microsoft and Google are large tech companies, and the fact that their battles are being borne out in government is not a surprise.
It also does not mean that Google is guilty of bad, abusive, or monopolistic behavior. If someone were to invent a better ad system, and/or a better search engine... i don't see Google going out and trying to stomp on the competition.
- aristus 17y agoWell... this particular article is not hating, it's pointing out that Google is attracting attention from regulators, and that it is talking very disingenuously about its market position. I have competed head-to-head with Google in the ad market, and they don't play nice. Neither does Yahoo. (Funnily, MSN was the nicest in Latam because they were the weakest player.) The problem is not that Google is evil. The problem is that when you have overwhelming marketshare, every time you shift your weight someone gets crushed. We expect and eventually demand that monopolists be more civilized and careful than everyone else.