3 ms·
If the jury didn't agree that the prior art was clear, then the prior art obviously was not clear. So really you're just saying that you don't agree with the j
by gibwell 13y ago
If the jury didn't agree that the prior art was clear, then the prior art obviously was not clear. So really you're just saying that you don't agree with the jury.
You also seem to be saying that Samsung should be allowed to abuse the court process as a way to steal secrets because Apple sued them, even though Apple won the case.
I'm sorry, but you are defending Samsung.
- shmerl 13y agoThe jury was incompetent. Prior art is there. Jury dismissed it with completely invalid arguments which demonstrated that they had no clue what they were dealing with (patent law). And jury didn't even follow guidelines set for them for this case (which were intended to make them understand application of patent law better). Allowed? I didn't say anything about allowed.
- gibwell 13y agoYou seem to claim to understand the law better than the judge.
- shmerl 13y agoThe judge pointed out that jury didn't follow the guidelines. It seems that you didn't really follow the case. Anyway, Samsung should invalidate these patents for good. Otherwise Apple will use them against someone else next time.