http://www.plosone.org/ http://www.plosone.org/ PLOS ONE is this. It is well respected already. The initial invited reviews are mainly a junk filter to establi

http://www.plosone.org/ http://www.plosone.org/ PLOS ONE is this. It is well respected already. The initial invited reviews are mainly a junk filter to establish baseline methodological quality and NOT to evaluate significance. From their "About us" page: "Unlike many journals which attempt to use the peer review process to determine whether or not an article reaches the level of 'importance' required by a given journal, PLOS ONE uses peer review to determine whether a paper is technically sound and worthy of inclusion in the published scientific record. Once the work is published in PLOS ONE, the broader community is then able to discuss and evaluate the significance of the article (through the number of citations it attracts; the downloads it achieves; the media and blog coverage it receives; and the post-publication Notes, Comments and Ratings that it receives on PLOS ONE etc)."