3 ms·

How you came to the conclusions that led you to write your comment absolutely baffles me. EDIT: Okay, you edited your bizarre comment to something that can be

How you came to the conclusions that led you to write your comment absolutely baffles me. EDIT: Okay, you edited your bizarre comment to something that can be replied to. You understand the concept of an outside council, right? The outside council works for a client but they are beholden to the law and restrictions of the court, with their entire firm lying in the balance. If you think Samsung just whispered kindly do them and they broke the law and professional credibility (again, if it was them), you don't understand law firms.

jfb 13y ago
It could have easily been a simple error in redaction. Knowing how information is disseminated in large companies, it's also easily possible that the actual source of the information to the Samsung execs had been obscured. Quinn Emmanuel is a reputable firm. I find it hard to believe that this was an intentional error. EDIT: In the interest of full disclosure, I'm a card-carrying salary-drawing member of Team AAPL.