I see. Thanks for the clarification. I still find it troubling that there's no burden of proof to violating someone's privacy before the court (there also does

I see. Thanks for the clarification. I still find it troubling that there's no burden of proof to violating someone's privacy before the court (there also doesn't seem to be any guarantee that decrypting the partition before the court would be done behind closed doors). But I guess there are many privacy issues not currently well addressed by U.S. laws...